The rules this archive runs on. They are public because they are the product: an archive is only worth citing if you can see how it was built.
Every claim carries a primary source. Six classes qualify:
Reviews, white papers, commission findings laid before parliaments.
Annual reports and threat assessments of European domestic services.
Formally constituted inquiries and their published records.
National and EU court rulings, cited from official databases.
Charters, platforms and statements - quoted, dated, linked.
Statements, hearings and sittings, and an institution's own videos about its findings or operations, published by the institution itself or by a broadcaster on its own channel. The archive reports what the publisher says the recording is; it does not characterise footage.
Interpretation is never presented as fact: wherever this archive goes beyond what a document says, the passage is visibly marked analysis. Sources are quoted with their location and the date the link was opened and verified. Verbatim quotes and summaries each carry a label. Typographic marks are set as plain keyboard characters, inside quotations too; the words are not changed.
The "2026 so far" list on the home page is kept apart from the register. It lists what national authorities announced themselves in 2026, each item linked to the official page and quoted from it. It is a floor, not a count: it covers only the official pages that could be opened, and it is replaced by Europol's figures when they appear. The selection rule is printed under the list, and every announcement found that the rule leaves out is counted there by what the authority names. Suspects are not named.
The subject is an ideology and its organisations - never a religious population. Nothing here attacks Muslims as a religious group or generalises from extremists to a community. Many of the people endangered by the movements this archive documents are themselves of Muslim background - dissidents, reformers, and those who left.
No deception. No fake personas, no astroturfing, no invented sources or numbers.
No demographic-replacement thesis. This site does not rest on it and rejects it. The measured record (see the Pew entry below): Muslims were 4.9% of Europe's population in 2016; even the highest 2050 migration scenario projects 14%. A claim refutable with one citation would take the true parts down with it.
Crime statistics by origin are a separate evidentiary track and are not chained to doctrine claims on this site.
Muslims were 4.9% of Europe's population in 2016; projected for 2050: 7.4% with zero migration, 11.2% under medium migration, 14% under high migration.Summarised by this archive, not quoted. Open the source to read its own words.
"Door hun gedachtegoed te normaliseren willen rechts-extremisten de democratische rechtsorde afbreken en uiteindelijk een witte etnostaat stichten."
Austria's Documentation Centre Political Islam - a fund of the Republic of Austria - shows that documenting this subject at state level is legitimate practice. This archive follows that model as an independent European effort.
The same principle governs the legal layer: the rules are published so that they can be checked. The legal notice states what is known about the publisher and, plainly, where the project's anonymity does not meet what German, Austrian and French law require. The privacy notice describes what this site does with data: no cookies, no accounts, no profile, one aggregate count of page views and countries, and one outside request: video thumbnails load from YouTube's image server. The terms of use set out how this archive quotes others, and what you may quote from it in turn.
The fourth is accuracy and corrections: the standard this archive is edited by. A claim here that its primary source does not support is wrong and gets changed; corrections are dated and recorded, and a withdrawn claim stays visible as withdrawn. This site accepts no correspondence; in place of a complaints channel, every claim is attached to a document you can open and check yourself.